
St. Thomas More head coach Dave Hollenbeck looks on from the sidelines during the Class A championship game on March 19. STM beat Viborg/Hurley and won its third state title in six years, all have come under the guidance of Hollenbeck. (Photo Kevin Cox/IDS)
EDITOR’S NOTE: It’s almost two weeks since St. Thomas More captured the Class A basketball title. With a few good night’s of sleep, and a few days of perspective, Cavalier head coach Dave Hollenbeck sat down with IDS reporter Sam Hurst for a lengthy interview about what it takes to build a championship program. In the course of their conversation, Hollenbeck talks about the importance of defense, how weight-lifting has changed the game, his support for a shot clock in Class A basketball, and his desire to play Rapid City Stevens and Central High Schools.
_________________________________
Sam Hurst: Congratulations Coach. Let’s start with the fact that you’ve won three championships in the last six years. You’re building a tradition at STM. But a coach needs time to build a program, to put his system in place, and not be measured by one season. Time is a hard thing to find these days.
Dave Hollenbeck: Yes. It takes time. This goes back to the way society is these days. Today’s youth, and today’s parents, want instant success and instant gratification. When I took the job 15 years ago I wanted to build a tradition. I wanted to get to where we had a tradition of being successful. And that took a lot of time. Those first seven years it took a lot to get over the hump. We struggled getting out of the district. We struggled getting to the state tournament. But now that we’ve been there and done that, we have a high expectation that filters down to our younger kids. They see what we’re doing. And they see how successful we’ve been. But with that it puts a pretty big target on us all the time. Everywhere we go people really give us their best shot. Everyone wants to beat us.
Sam Hurst: Maybe the competition makes you better.
Dave Hollenbeck: Yes, it does.
Sam Hurst: You had some great senior players this year. I’m thinking of Duffy, Tucker, and Bassett. Was it their talent or the system they played in that won the championship?
Dave Hollenbeck: You’ve got to have talent to win championships. That’s the bottom line. You’ve gotta have good players.
Sam Hurst: A system can’t win a championship?
Dave Hollenbeck: No. But continuity and a system of high expectations can help secure the opportunity of winning a championship. If you don’t have the right things in place, good talent can get beat. But you’re not going to win without talent. It’s got to be a combination of both.
One of the things about our program is that we’ve had continuity within our coaching staff. I have great coaches.
Sam Hurst: Did you know you had a team that could win a championship this year?
Dave Hollenbeck: We knew we were going to be a good team this year. We just didn’t know if we could win it or not because this was such a good year for ‘A’ basketball. There were so many good teams. We knew that whoever won this was winning something really special because of how good the competition was.

Hollenbeck and senior Liam Duffy celebrate after STM knocked off Viborg/Hurley and won the Class A state title on March 19. (Photo Kevin Cox/IDS)
Sam Hurst: So how about next year? How are you going to keep the expectations high when you lose Duffy, Tucker and Bassett?
Dave Hollenbeck: Obviously, you can’t replace a front line like that. Not only are those guys big, but they are good. We just have to do things a little different next year. We have to change our style a little bit. It involves more of a perimeter-oriented lineup, obviously, because we lose so much size. But we’ve got some good kids coming back, 6’6” and 6’5”, 6’4”. They are big enough provided that we get better. We’ll be competitive. Obviously to be as good as we were this year is very difficult. We have a lot of work to do.
But I love the kids I have coming up because they are hard working kids. In fact, I have to give them a lot of credit for this championship because they were the ones in practice every day beating on these five guys who did all the playing in the state tournament. It’s going to be their turn next year. I know how tough they are. These guys were brutal in practice. They made our starting lineup better. I swear today that that’s a big part of why we won the state championship.
Sam Hurst: Defense is a badge of honor for you, isn’t it?
Dave Hollenbeck: Yes. Our view is that if you can’t defend you will never win the big game. If you can defend, you can beat any team that plays run-and-gun and scores a lot of points. In today’s game there are four different ways to guard a screen. Back in the ‘70s and ‘80s, even the NBA couldn’t guard Stockton’s and Malone’s screens. But now they can. Partially it’s because they have changed the rules so that you can zone now in the NBA. But the fact of the matter is that defensive schemes have become so much more complex than they used to be. There are so many different ways to defend now. Those high scoring teams get shut down by good defensive teams.
We get criticized for not scoring a lot of points. But we limit the entire game’s possessions by how well we defend. We don’t give up easy baskets just so we can turn around and go score again. We defend, defend, defend.
People think we don’t want a shot clock. We would love to have a shot clock so that we only have to defend for thirty seconds. The shot clock plays into defensive-minded systems. I’d love to have a shot clock. If you can defend those first 25 seconds real well, the shot clock is in your favor because you’re going to force the other team to jack up a shot.
Sam Hurst: So why don’t you have a shot clock in ‘A’?
Dave Hollenbeck: I think in South Dakota it comes down to money. There are only sixteen or seventeen ‘AA’ schools. I don’t know what the cost is. Is it $5,000 to put the whole system in? But the ‘B’ and ‘A’ schools voted it down. I don’t know if it is so much on the principle of it or the cost of it.

Brandon Bassett is a shining example that weight lifting works in high school hoops. (Photo Kevin Cox/IDS)
Sam Hurst: One of the biggest changes in high school basketball has been that the players are so much stronger. It seems like teams that don’t lift weights these days are at a serious competitive disadvantage.
Dave Hollenbeck: Yes, definitely. We’ve got our own weight guy, Scott Benson, who works our guys out at his house. He takes them in 10, 12,14 at a time. That’s a huge advantage for us. I know that other schools are lifting. And some have way better weight facilities than we do. Our guys also do a lot of the Warwick Workouts, which allows them to develop the necessary skills in the off-season. Basketball is a sport of skill. But every day it is becoming equally important to have the strength. We saw it in the tournament. Those Chester kids, those Roncalli and Viborg kids, they are big and strong.
The whole need to lift weights goes back to the style of basketball these days compared to the 70s and 80s when I played. We had way different bodies. We weren’t big and physically strong. It was more of a finesse game. I think the game was called a little different back then. Today’s games are a lot more physical. I think the officials allow it to be more physical. So now if you are going to win in that type of environment you better lift weights.
Sam Hurst: Brandon Bassett’s strength got you a ton of points in the paint.
Dave Hollenbeck: Yes. Bassett is one of the players who bought in to the lifting side of it. Not every kid has bought in to that. They don’t understand how important it is. The further you get into the playoffs, the more important it becomes.
Sam Hurst: Brandon was so impressive because he was not just bulk. He had some athleticism and you have to figure that some of his athleticism was because of weight-lifting; taking the bulk and turning it into strength.
Dave Hollenbeck: That’s where Scott Benson has been so important to our program. He’s not only making them stronger, he’s making them more athletic. He’s working their cores and the athletic muscles. They can jump a little better. They’re a little quicker. And they are stronger. That gets back to ‘Do you have to have superstars to win ball games?’ I think if we can train them right and get their minds right, and get them in the right situations, you don’t have to have superstars. You have to have good players, but there are a lot of things that we can overcome.

Hollenbeck is well-known for bringing his passion for basketball to the sidelines. (Photo Kevin Cox/IDS)
Sam Hurst: You are so animated on the sidelines. You’re always waving your hands. Are you calling plays? What are you doing?
Dave Hollenbeck: I get caught up in the game. I’m in to it. I love the game. I have passion for it. I want the kids to know that. When I had my arms out, that particular night against Viborg, we were playing zone defense, so I was trying to get them to spread out. But we also have a lot of plays. We have a very complex system. We have so many set plays against zone and man-to-man. That’s part of the way the game has changed. Defenses have gotten so good that you have to find ways to score. You can’t just run up and down the floor and say ‘Okay we’re going to turn the horses loose, and hit a bunch of shots.’ That doesn’t work. It might work against some teams on your schedule, but in the end, I love to play those teams who think they are going to run up and down on us because we are going to take away all of your lay ups. Then, we’re going to go out and defend the three-point line. So what are you going to do if you don’t have a plan in place so that you can manufacture points?
A team may be able to get up and down, but they better be prepared when that up and down gets shut down. And against good teams they will shut that down.
Sam Hurst: You are seen by a lot of people as more of a college coach than a high school coach. You talk about the complexity of your system. Are you building a program at St. Thomas More that expects more out of your players than other high school programs can expect?
Dave Hollenbeck: You’re right. We’re trying to prepare these kids for college. I’ll be honest with you. We demand it in the classroom. And these guys perform in the classroom like it’s college prep. When they come to the basketball floor, we expect the same thing. If I have guys who are good enough to play college basketball, when they get recruited and they show up to play college basketball, I want them to be successful. I do not want them to have to transfer or leave or whatever because they couldn’t handle it. I don’t want them to leave the game. So…yeah. Our system is complex. I was a college coach. My assistant coach was a college coach. We talk to college coaches. We go to clinics a lot.
Sam Hurst: So with the program you’ve built, have you ever thought about playing “AA” schools? Have you ever thought about how you would stack up?
Dave Hollenbeck: We have played “AA” schools over the years. Our first big win at St. Thomas More was back in January, 1997. It was 9 below outside. We were playing Spearfish and they were ranked #3. They came and played us at our gym. That night Padraic Duffy hit five threes. We hit a last second shot and won the game. The stands cleared out onto the floor. It was just huge excitement. That was the night I met Liam Duffy and his brother Brandon, and their father Dan. After that game they came down on the floor. They were tiny. Dan was holding their hands. Liam was a tiny little squirt, he must have been about four years old. Last year we went down and got whipped by O’Gorman. They beat us by 14 in the Schooler Classic. They whipped us kind of hard because we weren’t quite prepared for their physical play. But then we went back to Sioux Falls a couple of weeks later and played Sioux Falls Washington. I think at one point in the third quarter we had them down 28. They were ranked four or five in “AA”. We ended up defeating them handily.
We want to play the “AA’s”–especially locally. To me it makes no sense that we don’t play them. I think it would be great for the community.
If we were to play Central or Stevens at the Civic Center, how many thousands of dollars would that generate for the programs? Now subtract the costs to taxpayers to load the teams on a bus and drive them East River. Erase that and then add $10,000 for playing St. Thomas More where you don’t have to start up the bus. To me as a taxpayer in difficult times, when we’re making all these cuts in schools, why not have St. Thomas More play Stevens and Central once a year at the Civic Center?
Sam Hurst: There are no SDHSAA rules that would block you from playing across class lines?
Dave Hollenbeck: No. None. If Darren Paulson (Central High School Activities Director) wants to play St. Thomas More, I’ve got a game open on my schedule for next year. All he has to do is schedule it. Same thing with Stevens. I have two open games on my schedule. I’ve filled 18 out of 20 and I’ll play Central and Stevens next year for the other two if they would agree to it, but it’s up to them.







I love it. Let’s see STM play RCC and RCS. I would definitely pay to see that. For that matter, I want to see STM play both teams in football too. Paulson, Vasquez, and Nowotny can make it happen if they want. People want to see it.
Great interview. Hollenbeck is pure class and it shows. He has a deep knowledge of the game. It’s nice to see the start of what could end up being another dynasty in RC.
Great article. I too would love to see STM play RCC and RCS. It would be great to see and great for the City. RCC used to play Custer every year back when Custer was in there heyday, and Custer would win some of the games. STM could compete easily with AA schools in basketball, in fact this year I am sure they would have won against RCC and RCS. Football though is a whole different animal. AA football is a big step up from the A level, mostly in size and depth and overall speed. At the A level if you have 2 or 3 really outstanding players, you can dominate alot of teams. That won’t work at the AA level. As bad as RCC and RCS have struggled over the years in football, do you actually think they would struggle against teams like Custer, Hill City, Lead-Deadwood, etc.. They wouldn’t. Not saying STM couldn’t give them a game in football, it just wouldn’t be as easy to compete as it would be in basketball.
Great article!! STM is building a great athletic program. More important than winning, they build character in the kids. Grades are very important. It you are not doing the work in school, you won’t be playing on the court.
As a taxpayer, I agree both Central and Stevens should play STM. And why wouldn’t they? It only makes sense. Play at the Civic Center and pack the house!! And just don’t stop with the boys’ program. Have the girls play… and let’s get the football programs on board also!! Cmon Darren and Jared, let’s get to scheduling.
Yet another class A coach who wants to see a shot clock. Luijtens said he also wanted one in an earlier story on IDS. Pretty sure I’ve heard that LeBeaux wants one too. How many top notch coaches have to say they want a shot clock before someone starts to listen?
Great interview Sam and Dave!
Central and Stevens would not receive any power points for beating a Class A team. In a season where every game counts toward playoff seedings, they gain nothing by playing STM, having said that, they would get points for beating Douglas but they don’t play them anymore either.
Do power points really matter when you play in a double-elimination system? No.
Come up with a better excuse.
One team wants to play. Two don’t. It’s pretty simple.
And, if we’re going to be totally honest, the game wouldn’t even “count” for power point purposes. Power points are an average, and games against lower class teams don’t factor into the average no matter the outcome.
If stevens would have played stm in football this year it would have been a 49 to 0 blow out!!!!
i watched both teams play, i do not think it would have been a blowout. That being said, it would be a great game to watch.
Stevens did play STM in football, albeit on the JV level. At Sioux Park, and it was a blowout in STM’s favor.
It was nice to see Stevens play better football this year. I want to see all local teams succeed. But I’m not convinced they would blow out STM. You’re going to tell me Richardson couldn’t run the ball against West River AA teams? Sullivan couldn’t throw the ball against AA teams? Let’s look back to STM teams past. They have produced better football players than the AA schools. The Jacobson’s, Sullivan, Nowotny just to name a few. Pretty sure those guys would have handle themselves just fine against the AA schools. The question is how would STM measure up physically? All of these questions are the exact reason they should play. Let’s get the answer.
I see why the AA schools wouldn’t want to play STM. If they win, they should. If they lose, it would be considered by some as embarrassing. But who cares it would be fun to see and could raise some serious cash. Who knows we might be missing what could end up being a great rivalry.
By the way, with the exception of Aquallo possibly scoring 30 points, I think STM would have beaten Central this year in basketball. No question in my mind they would have beat Stevens. Too bad we have to deal in hypotheticals because the powers that be aren’t making it happen.
I would be curious to hear Paulson’s rationale as to why Central can’t play STM at any level. Power points logic really doesn’t hold much water when you consider that half of all AA basketball teams make the state tournament and at least one team from Stevens/Central/Sturgis/Douglas HAS to make the tournament.. Given Central’s recent performances in the state tournament, I’m not sure how a lower seeding could provide a worse result.
Additionally, power points has nothing to do with refusing to play at the sub-varisty levels. Central JV played Kadoka this year! Could they not find anyone in town to give them a game?
Bottom line is that STM plays Central and Stevens in team camps and post-season tournaments every year and provides a high level of competition. But for some reason, Paulson still feels the need to leave the zip code to schedule sanctioned games. Why would that be?
how many players did stm have do D1 this year….because stevens had 4 players. They also stopped much better running attacks then stm’s this year. Pierre, O’ Gorman, even central’s running game was better them stm’s. Also when you say Stevens and stm’s JV played it was Stevens lower JV and sophomores and stm’s varsity i believed sullivan actually played in the game and it was only 28 to 7, and don’t compare stm’s past teams to this years because there team this year BLEW!!
Re: Stevens at 1:55pm…
It’s been a while, and I don’t think I cared as much as you obviously do, but Jake Sullivan QB’d much of the first half before handing off (so to speak) to Newt Johnson, who later handed off to the 8th grade QB to finish the game. Sullivan was a sophomore and Johnson a freshman, so both would have been JV on the Stevens squad. Also, keep in mind that STM started an 8th grader on the varsity line all season and STM seniors didn’t dress for the game at all, so your point about it just being Stevens “lower JV and sophomores” is moot. In Stevens’ defense, it was a bye week on STM’s schedule, while Stevens had a varsity game the next night. All I was trying to point out was that Stevens and STM do actually play football, even though it’s on the JV level. I think you’re right, the score was 28 to 7, but if you saw the game, you’d know it could have easily been 49-0 had STM not subbed down…way down.
Re your question, Tyler Richardson is going to play football for USD; I have no idea about any other players’ plans. Given that, and comparing STM’s enrollment of 250 vs Stevens enrollment of 1632 students, Stevens should be yielding 7 Division 1 prospects, at least.
FWIW -
I think you just proved a point with that last statement. The reason Stevens or Central don’t play STM is because of your last statement.
“Given that, and comparing STM’s enrollment of 250 vs Stevens enrollment of 1632 students, Stevens should be yielding 7 Division 1 prospects, at least.”
It’s lose/lose! If they lose, they have a horrible program and they should be embarrased, if they win they are supposed to win – look at how many kids they have to pick from. It’s not about potential of winning or losing that keeps this from happening. It’s the knowing what is coming afterward – from the parents & fans of both sides – that keeps it from happening.
I am asking, because I don’t know – were the coaches and fans of STM (especially the basketball ones) asking to play Stevens and Central 10-15 years ago when STM was average in the athletic arena? I DON’T THINK SO!!
Funny how an article about STM playing Central or Stevens in Boys Basketball turns into a hypothetical discussion about what would happen in football. Perhaps nobody wants to discuss what could happen in basketball. And maybe what “could happen” is the reason why they don’t play.
Re Exactly,
You have a point, and I too think that is why Stevens & Central don’t play STM. If they win, they were supposed to, if they lose, they’ll never hear the end of it. …who said life was fair? Kind of like how the blogs all focus on the players that the public schools lose to STM and how terrible that is, yet never mention the SES/STM former students that choose to move to the public schools.
But it was “Stevens” the poster who came on, demanding to know what STM had to compare to their 4 D1 prospects. I simply answered, and tried to put it into perspective for him/her. I don’t think people tend to realize just how much smaller STM is than the public high schools in town. And no, not every student in the hallways is there to play sports.
As far as looking for AA competition 10 or 15 years ago; according to the article above, the answer seems to be yes.
Well lets compare seasons on their respectable levels. I believe Stevens was 7-4 (with big wins over O’Gorman and Pierre), and i think STM was 8-3 (with big wins over Vermillion? Custer?) Not what i would call top tear competition. Which Stevens had to play all year long. That four D1 athletes was in football only…in every sport Stevens had 10 D1 athletes(and thats only the guys…not sure about girls). So if Stevens has 6 times as many kids as STM, and STM only has one D1 athlete then Stevens should only have 6, but we have 10 so it looks like we were better in that too.
I would love to see STM play both RCC and RCS in football and basketball. The revenues to the schools would certainly increase as the crowd volume would be there. I agree with an earlier statement that the Steven’s football program is headed in the right direction and seems to be improving each year. Thus a game between the STM and RCS would prove interesting. Through good coaching a team performs at a level above their individual talents and thus one of the reasons STM has been successful in both football and basketball. Certainly without actual games being played any determination of outcome is certainly speculation at best. I would however say that Steven’s could not compete in basketball as that program has dwindled down over the last 5-10 years and becomes less competitive each year. My heart goes out to the boys who have a passion for basketball at Stevens. With today’s budget concerns an inter-city game with no travel cost and increased revenues would seem a no-brainer. Maybe we could put up a billboard promoting the idea.
The funny thing is these same boys grow up playing each other in all sports through the youth programs. With boys “open” enrolling in the public schools as well as “choosing” private schools. It would be great to see all of the schools compete against each other at the high school level. If you ask me it is a no brainer.
All would be solved if STM manned up and elected to go to AA like O’Gorman did. Then Central and Stevens would have to play them.
O’Gorman ADM 575
STM ADM 202
Not really the same.
There would be nothing requiring Central or Stevens to play them in basketball (other than in Regions) even if they were AA. Douglas is AA and neither school plays them.
The sad thing is we already have an inter city match up between Central and Stevens and they play at their own gyms for basketball. Never at the Rushmore Civic center. Yes, is a great atmosphere for the players and fans but would bring in many more fans if held at the Civic Center. My son played for Central and if you would ask the kids, they would love to play STM, just as much as they love to play Stevens. This is not a lose/lose for Central or Stevens, it is a Win/Win for the players and the fans.